To manage contiguous word ranges.
- §5. Construction
- §7. Reading
- §8. Manipulation
- §9. Widening
- §10. Position
- §11. Emptiness
- §12. Comparing wordings
- §17. Bracketing
- §20. Searching for unusual spacing in ranges
- §21. The Writer
§1. Wordings are an efficient representation of a multi-word name for something, using the fact that almost all names derive from contiguous runs of words in the source text.
Recall that words are numbered from 0 upwards in order of reading into the lexer. The wording Wordings::new(A, B) represents both a positional marker, at word number A, and also some textual content, the text making up words A to B inclusive. Different wordings can represent the same text at different positions in the source text, for example if "brown spotted owl" occurs multiple times.
typedef struct wording { int word_A, word_B; } wording;
- The structure wording is private to this section.
§2. Note that this applies even to the empty text. A wording holds no text if both A and B are negative, or if A is larger than B. Thus the wording (17, 16) represents the empty text at position 17. (Preform makes use of this when parsing nonterminals which match conditionally but consume no text, for example.) When we are representing no text and no position either, we should use the following constant wording:
define EMPTY_WORDING ((wording) { -1, -1 })
§3. Annoyingly, gcc (though not clang) rejects this as an initializer, so we also need:
define EMPTY_WORDING_INIT { -1, -1 }
§4. We will frequently want to loop through the words in a wording, so the following macro is convenient. Note that the loop body is not executed if the wording is empty.
define LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(i, W) if (W.word_A >= 0) for (int i=W.word_A; i<=W.word_B; i++)
wording Wordings::new(int A, int B) { return (wording) { A, B }; } wording Wordings::one_word(int A) { return (wording) { A, A }; }
§6. Note that these two are sometimes used to construct empty wordings either by moving A past B, or moving B before A.
wording Wordings::up_to(wording W, int last_wn) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return W; W.word_B = last_wn; return W; } wording Wordings::from(wording W, int first_wn) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return W; W.word_A = first_wn; return W; }
int Wordings::length(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return 0; return W.word_B - W.word_A + 1; } int Wordings::phrasual_length(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return 0; int bl = 0, n = 0; LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(i, W) { if ((Lexer::word(i) == OPENBRACKET_V) || (Lexer::word(i) == OPENBRACE_V)) bl++; if ((Lexer::word(i) == CLOSEBRACKET_V) || (Lexer::word(i) == CLOSEBRACE_V)) bl--; if (bl == 0) n++; } return n; } int Wordings::first_wn(wording W) { return W.word_A; } int Wordings::last_wn(wording W) { return W.word_B; } int Wordings::delta(wording W1, wording W2) { return W1.word_A - W2.word_A; }
§8. Manipulation. Unlike the construction routines above, these never make positional empty wordings.
wording Wordings::truncate(wording W, int max) { if (Wordings::length(W) > max) W.word_B = W.word_A + max - 1; return W; } wording Wordings::first_word(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return EMPTY_WORDING; W.word_B = W.word_A; return W; } wording Wordings::last_word(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return EMPTY_WORDING; W.word_A = W.word_B; return W; } wording Wordings::trim_first_word(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return EMPTY_WORDING; W.word_A++; if (W.word_A > W.word_B) return EMPTY_WORDING; return W; } wording Wordings::trim_last_word(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return EMPTY_WORDING; W.word_B--; if (W.word_A > W.word_B) return EMPTY_WORDING; return W; } wording Wordings::trim_both_ends(wording W) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return EMPTY_WORDING; W.word_A++; W.word_B--; if (W.word_A > W.word_B) return EMPTY_WORDING; return W; }
wording Wordings::union(wording W1, wording W2) { if (Wordings::empty(W1)) return W2; if (Wordings::empty(W2)) return W1; int w1 = W1.word_A; if (w1 > W2.word_A) w1 = W2.word_A; the min int w2 = W1.word_B; if (w2 < W2.word_B) w2 = W2.word_B; the max return Wordings::new(w1, w2); }
int Wordings::within(wording SMALL, wording BIG) { if ((Wordings::nonempty(SMALL)) && (Wordings::nonempty(BIG)) && (SMALL.word_A >= BIG.word_A) && (SMALL.word_B <= BIG.word_B)) return TRUE; return FALSE; } source_location Wordings::location(wording W) { return Lexer::word_location(W.word_A); }
int Wordings::empty(wording W) { if ((W.word_A >= 0) && (W.word_B >= W.word_A)) return FALSE; return TRUE; } int Wordings::nonempty(wording W) { if ((W.word_A >= 0) && (W.word_B >= W.word_A)) return TRUE; return FALSE; }
§12. Comparing wordings. First, though it's little needed, literal equality: two wordings are the same only if they represent the same word numbers in the source.
int Wordings::eq(wording W1, wording W2) { if ((W1.word_A == W2.word_A) && (W1.word_B == W2.word_B)) return TRUE; return FALSE; }
§13. Two wordings are said to "match" if they are nonempty and contain the same text.
The calculation overhead makes it marginally not worth using a hash function to speed up the following comparison, which requires two excerpts to be absolutely equal.
int Wordings::match(wording W1, wording W2) { if ((W1.word_A >= 0) && (W1.word_B >= 0) && (Wordings::match_inner(W1.word_A, W1.word_B, W2.word_A, W2.word_B))) return TRUE; return FALSE; } int Wordings::starts_with(wording W, wording S) { if ((Wordings::nonempty(W)) && (Wordings::nonempty(S)) && (Wordings::length(W) >= Wordings::length(S)) && (Wordings::match_inner(W.word_A, W.word_A + S.word_B - S.word_A, S.word_A, S.word_B))) return TRUE; return FALSE; } int Wordings::match_inner(int w1, int w2, int w3, int w4) { if (w4-w3 != w2-w1) return FALSE; if ((w1<0) || (w3<0)) return FALSE; for (int j=0; j<=w2-w1; j++) if (compare_words(w1+j, w3+j) == FALSE) return FALSE; return TRUE; }
int Wordings::match_cs(wording W1, wording W2) { if ((W1.word_A >= 0) && (W1.word_B >= 0) && (Wordings::match_cs_inner(W1.word_A, W1.word_B, W2.word_A, W2.word_B))) return TRUE; return FALSE; } int Wordings::match_cs_inner(int w1, int w2, int w3, int w4) { if (w4-w3 != w2-w1) return FALSE; if ((w1<0) || (w3<0)) return FALSE; for (int j=0; j<=w2-w1; j++) if (compare_words_cs(w1+j, w3+j) == FALSE) return FALSE; return TRUE; }
§15. This alternative form is slower, but gets the case where one of the words holds double-quoted text correctly. (We don't need this often because quoted text is in general not allowed in identifier names.)
int Wordings::match_perhaps_quoted(wording W1, wording W2) { int w1 = W1.word_A, w2 = W1.word_B, w3 = W2.word_A, w4 = W2.word_B; if (w4-w3 != w2-w1) return FALSE; if ((w1<0) || (w3<0)) return FALSE; for (int j=0; j<=w2-w1; j++) { if (compare_words(w1+j, w3+j) == FALSE) { if ((Vocabulary::test_flags(w1+j, (TEXT_MC+TEXTWITHSUBS_MC))) && (Vocabulary::test_flags(w3+j, (TEXT_MC+TEXTWITHSUBS_MC))) && (Wide::cmp(Lexer::word_raw_text(w1+j), Lexer::word_raw_text(w3+j)) == 0)) continue; return FALSE; } } return TRUE; }
§16. And relatedly, used for sorting into alphabetical order, a direct analogue of strcmp but for word ranges:
int Wordings::strcmp(wording X, wording Y) { int x1 = X.word_A, x2 = X.word_B, y1 = Y.word_A, y2 = Y.word_B; if (x1 < 0) { if (y1 < 0) return 0; return -1; } if (y1 < 0) return 1; int n; int l1 = x2 - x1 + 1; int l2 = y2 - y1 + 1; for (n=0; (n<l1) && (n<l2); n++) { int delta = Wide::cmp(Lexer::word_text(x1 + n), Lexer::word_text(y1 + n)); if (delta != 0) return delta; } return l1 - l2; }
§17. Bracketing. We are going to need to look for paired brackets at the outside of an excerpt reasonably quickly, and the following routine performs that test.
int Wordings::paired_brackets(wording W) { if ((Lexer::word(Wordings::first_wn(W)) == OPENBRACKET_V) && (Lexer::word(Wordings::last_wn(W)) == CLOSEBRACKET_V) && (Wordings::mismatched_brackets(Wordings::trim_both_ends(W)) == FALSE)) return TRUE; return FALSE; }
int Wordings::mismatched_brackets(wording W) { int bl = 0; LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(i, W) { if ((Lexer::word(i) == OPENBRACKET_V) || (Lexer::word(i) == OPENBRACE_V)) bl++; if ((Lexer::word(i) == CLOSEBRACKET_V) || (Lexer::word(i) == CLOSEBRACE_V)) bl--; if (bl < 0) return TRUE; } if (bl != 0) return TRUE; return FALSE; }
§19. For syntax disambiguation:
int Wordings::top_level_comma(wording W) { int bl = 0; LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(i, W) { if ((Lexer::word(i) == OPENBRACKET_V) || (Lexer::word(i) == OPENBRACE_V)) bl++; if ((Lexer::word(i) == CLOSEBRACKET_V) || (Lexer::word(i) == CLOSEBRACE_V)) bl--; if ((bl == 0) && (Lexer::word(i) == COMMA_V)) return TRUE; } return FALSE; }
§20. Searching for unusual spacing in ranges. Looking forward to see how far the current column or row extends, for formatted tables. The idea is that we have a range w1 to w2, and that the current column or row extends from w1 but may run only part-way through: we look for the first point at which there is a tab break (for column scanning) or a newline break (for row scanning), and return the word position just before that break. If we do not find one, it follows that the entire range holds the current column or row, and we return w2.
int Wordings::last_word_of_formatted_text(wording W, int tab_flag) { if (Wordings::empty(W)) return -1; if (Wordings::length(W) == 1) return Wordings::first_wn(W); LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(i, W) if (i > Wordings::first_wn(W)) if (((tab_flag) && (Lexer::break_before(i) == '\t')) || (Lexer::indentation_level(i) > 0) || (Lexer::break_before(i) == '\n')) return i-1; return Wordings::last_wn(W); }
§21. The Writer. The following implements the %W escape, which comes in four varieties:
void Wordings::writer(OUTPUT_STREAM, char *format_string, wording W) { switch (format_string[0]) { case 'W': bare %W means the same as %-W, so fall through to... case '-': Write the stream with normalised casing21.1; break; case '+': Write the stream raw21.2; break; case '<': Write the stream in an abbreviated raw form21.3; break; case '~': Write the stream in a raw form suitable for use in an I6 literal string21.4; break; default: internal_error("bad %W modifier"); } }
§21.1. Note that the empty wording causes nothing to be written to the stream.
Write the stream with normalised casing21.1 =
LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(j, W) { WRITE("%N", j); if (j<Wordings::last_wn(W)) WRITE(" "); }
- This code is used in §21.
§21.2. Raw, in this context, means that it retains its original case, but not that it retains its original spacing. This is sometimes problematic: we need to go to some trouble to make punctuation look reasonably nice again, to obtain, say,
The auctioneer said: "I'm not through yet -".
in preference to:
The auctioneer said : "I'm not through yet -" .
Note that we are not actually preserving the spacing in the original source — that might have line breaks or other curiosities which we don't want: we are instead imposing what we think are normal English conventions. While this will sometimes be wrong, this is only likely to affect the index and problem messages, so the user is not likely to be bothered.
Write the stream raw21.2 =
LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(j, W) { WRITE("%<N", j); int space = FALSE; if (j<Wordings::last_wn(W)) { space = TRUE; if (compare_word(j+1, COMMA_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(j+1, COLON_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(j+1, CLOSEBRACKET_V)) space = FALSE; } if (compare_word(j, OPENBRACKET_V)) space = FALSE; if (space) WRITE(" "); }
- This code is used in §21.
§21.3. A variation on this tries to contain unreasonably long pastes of quoted literals, and is used in printing out problem messages, where quoting back the offending source text might make unhelpfully vast paragraphs in which the actual information is more or less hidden.
define STRING_TOLERANCE_LIMIT 70
Write the stream in an abbreviated raw form21.3 =
if (Wordings::empty(W)) { WRITE("<no text>"); } else { LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(i, W) { int space = TRUE; if (i == Wordings::first_wn(W)) space = FALSE; else { if (compare_word(i, COMMA_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(i, COLON_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(i, SEMICOLON_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(i, CLOSEBRACE_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(i, CLOSEBRACKET_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(i-1, OPENBRACE_V)) space = FALSE; if (compare_word(i-1, OPENBRACKET_V)) space = FALSE; } if (space) WRITE(" "); inchar32_t *p = Lexer::word_raw_text(i); int L = Wide::len(p); if (L > STRING_TOLERANCE_LIMIT+5) { for (int j=0; j<STRING_TOLERANCE_LIMIT/2; j++) PUT(p[j]); WRITE(" [...] "); for (int j=STRING_TOLERANCE_LIMIT/2; j>0; j--) PUT(p[L-j]); } else { WRITE("%w", p); } if ((i >= Wordings::first_wn(W)+1) && (compare_word(i-1, OPENI6_V))) { WRITE("-)"); } } }
- This code is used in §21.
§21.4. Another variation, this time formatted for use in I6 double-quoted text. Here we don't care about punctuation spacing, because we are only writing in comments and I6 debugging routines, but we do need to use the I6 escape ~ for a double-quotation mark.
Write the stream in a raw form suitable for use in an I6 literal string21.4 =
LOOP_THROUGH_WORDING(j, W) { inchar32_t *str = Lexer::word_raw_text(j); if (j>Wordings::first_wn(W)) WRITE(" "); for (int k=0; str[k] != 0; k++) { inchar32_t c = str[k]; switch (c) { case '@': WRITE("@@"); break; case '"': WRITE("~"); break; case '^': WRITE("[cr]"); break; case '\\': WRITE("[backslash]"); break; default: PUT(c); } } }
- This code is used in §21.